One of the major reasons for studying chemical kinetics is to use measurements of the macroscopic properties of a system, name: 2-Phenyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline, such as the rate of change in the concentration of reactants or products with time.In a article, mentioned the application of 3340-78-1, Name is 2-Phenyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline, molecular formula is C15H15N
2-(substituted phenyl)-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-2-iums as novel antifungal lead compounds: Biological evaluation and structure-activity relationships
The title compounds are a class of structurally simple analogues of quaternary benzo[c]phenanthridine alkaloids (QBAs). In order to develop novel QBA-like antifungal drugs, in this study, 24 of the title compounds with various substituents on the N-phenylring were evaluated for bioactivity against seven phytopathogenic fungi using the mycelial growth rate method and their SAR discussed. Almost all the compounds showed definite activities in vitro against each of the test fungi at 50 mug/mL and a broad antifungal spectrum. In most cases, the mono-halogenated compounds 2-12 exhibited excellentactivities superior to the QBAs sanguinarine and chelerythrine. Compound 8 possessed the strongest activities on each of the fungi with EC50 values of 8.88-19.88 mug/mL and a significant concentration-dependent relationship. The SAR is as follows: the N-phenyl group is a high sensitive structural moiety for the activity and the characteristics and position of substituents intensively influence the activity. Generally, electron-withdrawing substituents remarkably enhance the activity while electron-donating substituents cause a decrease of the activity. In most cases, ortha- and para-halogenated isomers were more active than the corresponding m-halogenated isomers. Thus, the title compounds emerged as promising lead compounds for the development of novel biomimetic antifungal agrochemicals. Compounds 8 and 2 should have great potential as new broad spectrum antifungal agents for plant protection.
Sometimes chemists are able to propose two or more mechanisms that are consistent with the available data. name: 2-Phenyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline, If a proposed mechanism predicts the wrong experimental rate law, however, the mechanism must be incorrect.Welcome to check out more blogs about 3340-78-1, in my other articles.
Reference£º
Tetrahydroisoquinoline – Wikipedia,
1,2,3,4-Tetrahydroisoquinoline | C9H11N – PubChem